H-1B in 2026: The $100,000 Fee Litigation and the Wage-Weighted Lottery, Explained

Two changes have reshaped the H-1B programme within a single year: a $100,000 fee attached to certain H-1B filings, and the replacement of the random cap lottery with a wage-weighted selection process. One of them is currently tied up in litigation. The other is now the law of the land and has already run once.

Because both are moving, the most valuable thing an article on this subject can do is separate what is settled from what is not, and tell you what to do in the meantime.

The $100,000 fee: where it actually stands

A presidential proclamation issued in September 2025 imposed a $100,000 payment in connection with certain new H-1B petitions for beneficiaries outside the United States. The practical effect was immediate and severe: offshore H-1B hiring became uneconomic for all but the largest employers, and a large share of planned filings simply did not happen.

The fee was then challenged. The sequence matters:

• 8 June 2026 — the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts vacated the fee, holding that it amounted to a tax imposed without congressional authorisation and that the agency action violated the Administrative Procedure Act.

• Mid-June 2026 — the ruling was briefly stayed while the government sought appellate relief, leaving the proclamation temporarily in effect.

• 24 July 2026 — the First Circuit declined to stay the district court's vacatur pending appeal, finding the government had not shown a sufficient likelihood of success.

The practical position as of August 2026 is that the fee should not apply to H-1B filings. The appeal continues, a separate challenge remains pending in California, and agency guidance has lagged the court rulings — which means employers may still encounter processing confusion at the operational level.

What employers should do

1. Confirm the current litigation and guidance position on the day you file. This is not a question to answer once.

2. If you paid the fee, retain complete documentation. Refund mechanisms have not been resolved and will require proof.

3. Do not treat the vacatur as permanent. Build filing plans that survive the fee being reinstated on appeal.

4. Where a candidate can be brought in through a category unaffected by the proclamation, that route retains value regardless of the outcome.

The wage-weighted lottery: this one is real and already running

DHS finalised a rule replacing random selection in the H-1B cap lottery with a weighted process based on wage level. It took effect in early 2026 and has now been applied to a cap season.

The mechanism is straightforward in concept: registrations at higher Department of Labor wage levels receive proportionally greater weight in selection. A Level IV registration is materially more likely to be selected than a Level I registration. Random selection has not disappeared entirely — but the odds are no longer equal.

Who this helps and who it hurts

• Senior and specialised roles at established employers, where offered wages sit at Levels III and IV, are the clear beneficiaries.

• Entry-level positions — recent graduates on F-1 OPT, junior engineers, early-career analysts — are the clear losers. Level I registrations now face substantially reduced odds.

• Employers in lower-cost geographic areas are disadvantaged relative to those in high-wage metros, because wage levels are set against local prevailing wage data.

• Cap-exempt employers — universities, affiliated non-profits, government research organisations — are unaffected, and their relative attractiveness has risen sharply.

The trap: registration commitments

The weighted system requires employers to commit at registration to the occupational classification, wage level and worksite. That commitment is then measured against the petition filed after selection. Ordinary business changes between March and the filing deadline — a promotion, a relocation, a reorganization, a revised job description — now create real exposure.

Practitioners have widely predicted an elevated rate of Requests for Evidence and denials arising from exactly this mismatch, compounded by closer USCIS scrutiny of whether the offered wage genuinely corresponds to the claimed level. The discipline required at registration is much higher than it used to be. Register the job you will actually file.

What this means strategically

For a decade the standard advice to an employer with a foreign national hire was: run the lottery, and if you miss, run it again next year. That advice no longer works for entry-level roles, where two or three consecutive misses is now a realistic expectation rather than bad luck.

The alternatives deserve serious evaluation earlier than they used to:

•      O-1A — for candidates with genuine distinction in their field. No cap, no lottery, no annual timing constraint. Approval rates have remained high relative to other extraordinary-ability categories.

•      L-1 — for candidates with a year of qualifying employment at a related entity abroad. Frequently the fastest route for multinational employers.

•      TN — for Canadian and Mexican citizens in listed professions. Fast, inexpensive and renewable, and often overlooked by US employers who do not realize a candidate qualifies.

•      E-2 and E-3 — for nationals of treaty countries and, separately, Australian nationals.

•      Cap-exempt H-1B — a university, affiliated non-profit or qualifying research organization can file at any time with no lottery. Concurrent employment arrangements are sometimes viable.

•      EB-2 NIW and EB-1A — self-petitioned green card routes that bypass employer sponsorship entirely, though the timeline is measured in years for backlogged countries.

Cross-border considerations

For Canadian citizens, the TN category remains the most underused option in US immigration. It is not subject to a cap or a lottery, it requires no fee comparable to the H-1B proclamation, and for professions on the USMCA list it can often be obtained at a port of entry. It carries real limitations — it is a nonimmigrant category with no direct path to permanent residence, and dual intent is treated more restrictively than under H-1B — but for many roles it solves the immediate problem while a longer-term strategy is built.

Equally, employers priced out of US hiring have increasingly looked north. Canada's intra-company transfer category, the Global Talent Stream with its two-week service standard, and Express Entry without employer sponsorship all present genuine alternatives for roles that do not need to sit in the United States.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the $100,000 H-1B fee currently being charged?

Following the June 2026 vacatur and the First Circuit's July 2026 refusal to stay it, the fee should not apply. The appeal continues and the position could change, so verify current status before filing.

Did the fee apply to extensions and change-of-status filings?

The proclamation was directed at certain new petitions for beneficiaries outside the United States. Its application to other filing types was narrower and was one of the contested issues. Confirm the current position for your specific filing.

How does the weighted lottery change my odds?

Registrations at higher DOL wage levels receive proportionally greater weight. Level I registrations — typically entry-level roles — face materially reduced selection odds compared with the previous random system.

Can I change the job details after registration?

Changes between registration and filing create real risk. The registration commits you to occupational classification, wage level and worksite, and mismatches are a leading cause of RFEs under the new system.

What is the best alternative if we keep missing the lottery?

It depends on the candidate. O-1A for distinguished profiles, L-1 for internal transfers, TN for Canadians and Mexicans, cap-exempt H-1B through a qualifying institution, or a self-petitioned green card route.

Why Work with an Immigration Lawyer?

H-1B strategy currently has to survive a moving legal target. The $100,000 fee has been vacated and is on appeal, agency guidance has lagged the court rulings, and the wage-weighted lottery has permanently changed the odds for entry and mid-level roles. Employers planning on last year's assumptions are planning on nothing.

At Tchern McCallum Immigration Law, we:

•      Confirm the current fee and litigation position on the day you file, not the day you plan

•      Register accurately, since occupation, wage level and worksite now bind you at petition stage

•      Assess O-1, L-1, TN, E-2 and cap-exempt routes before you rely on the lottery again

•      Build a filing strategy that survives the fee being reinstated on appeal

Our goal is to get your candidate working without betting the role on a lottery.

Ready to Plan Your Next Filing?

For entry-level positions, two or three consecutive lottery misses is now a realistic expectation rather than bad luck. The alternatives deserve evaluation earlier than they used to.

Contact Tchern McCallum Immigration Law today to book a consultation and review your filing plan against the current position.

SET UP A CALL